the article examines the distinction between creation of a new thing and processing of another person’s materials as original grounds for acquiring ownership. It analyzes Articles 218, 219 and 220 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and the approaches reflected in Resolution No. 10 and No. 22 of April 29, 2010. The paper substantiates the need for a clearer legislative definition of a new thing, the criterion for oneself, and the standard for determining whether the value of processing substantially exceeds the value of materials.
ownership, new thing, processing, for oneself criterion, immovable property, good faith.
1. Bevzenko R. S. Vozniknovenie prava sobstvennosti na vnov' sozdavaemoe nedvizhimoe imuschestvo // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2019. № 3. S. 137–153.
2. Bogdan V. V., Korotkih O. A. Sozdanie nedvizhimoy veschi dlya sebya kak uslovie priobreteniya prava sobstvennosti // NOMOTHETIKA: Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Pravo. 2020. T. 45, № 4. S. 726–731.
3. Sklovskiy K. I. Kommentariy k Postanovleniyu Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF i Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 29 aprelya 2010 g. № 10/22 «O nekotoryh voprosah, voznikayuschih v sudebnoy praktike pri razreshenii sporov, svyazannyh s zaschitoy prava sobstvennosti i drugih veschnyh prav». M.: Statut, 2011. 144 s.
4. Sklovskiy K. I. Sobstvennost' v grazhdanskom prave. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Statut, 2008. 912 s.
5. Sorokin A. I. Specifikaciya: istoriya i real'nost' // Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review. 2014. № 4. S. 254–259.
