the article examines the controversial legal regime of unauthorized construction in Russian civil law. It considers the judicial conditions for recognition of property right and the balance between the builder’s private interest and public requirements of land, urban planning and registration control. The study shows that the current judicial approach is based on verification of land title, the nature of the violations, the possibility of bringing the object into compliance with mandatory parameters, and the absence of threats to life, health and third party rights. The paper proposes clarifying legalization criteria and allocation of the burden of proof.
unauthorized construction, property right, land plot, judicial practice, legalization of construction.
1. Bolbina, D. A. Isk o snose samovol'noy postroyki. Pravovaya priroda i praktika primeneniya / D. A. Bolbina // Voprosy rossiyskoy yusticii. – 2024. – № 32. – S. 54–64.
2. Gumilevskaya, O. V. Osnovaniya priznaniya prava sobstvennosti na samovol'no vozvedennye nedvizhimye ob'ekty. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. 12.00.03 / O. V. Gumilevskaya. – Krasnodar, 2008. – 23 s.
3. Sklovskiy, K. I. Kommentariy k Postanovleniyu Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF i Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 29 aprelya 2010 g. № 10/22 «O nekotoryh voprosah, voznikayuschih v sudebnoy praktike pri razreshenii sporov, svyazannyh s zaschitoy prava sobstvennosti i drugih veschnyh prav» / K. I. Sklovskiy. – Moskva. Statut, 2011. – 144 s.
4. Suhanov, E. A. Grazhdanskoe pravo. V 4 t. T. 2. Veschnoe pravo. Nasledstvennoe pravo. Isklyuchitel'nye prava. Lichnye neimuschestvennye prava. Uchebnik / otv. red. E. A. Suhanov. – 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. – Moskva. Volters Kluver, 2008. – 496 s.
5. Tkachenko, A. A. Priznanie prava sobstvennosti na samovol'nuyu postroyku. Voprosy teorii i praktiki / A. A. Tkachenko // Nauchnyy zhurnal KubGAU. – 2011. – № 74(10). – S. 1–16.
